|Open Source Software|
|Open Source Software Assets||Open Source Software - Origins||Intellectual Property and Patents|
|European Markets||Open Source Projects||Linux Operating System|
|Open Source Software - Opportunity||Open Source Software - Advantages, Tradeoffs, and Disadvantages||Open Source Aggregation and Research|
OSS: open source software assets can affect information technology initiatives in positive and negative ways. The major benefits are driven by a confluence of cost optimization and flexibility. The principal risks are unmanaged software assets that can introduce technical and legal challenges: security, intellectual property management, and audit compliance. There will be costs that have to be budgeted in conjunction with its implementation. Open source code continues to be making its way into enterprise software. Leading market research firms have reported that between 80 to 90 percent of commercial software companies use open source components. Open source software is an alternative way of investing in intellectual property. It is an avenue of innovation and enabler for applying a more agile approach to digital transformation.
The successful integration of open source software will require an organization-specific governance model which:
Open source software is not an all or nothing decision; it can be utilized in hybrid combinations with commercial software.
The Open Source Initiative was founded in the late 1990's as a innovative, community-enabled model for creating quality software based on widely accepted industry standards. The foundation of open source software distributed under the GPL: General Public License is that any organization or person that releases code into the market under that designation places no restrictions on its use. Open source software is available free or at minimal cost. The bottom-up grass roots nature of open source has led advocates to view the projects as a populist foil to commercial software, where a company keeps the inner workings of its applications secret.
Commercial vendors have built for-profit businesses around open source products. The three most common business models are:
Charging for enterprise-class support of the free software.
Offering specialized enterprise versions of the open source software which provide significantly enhanced functionality, commercial support packages, and management tools.
Providing the software free of charge; but selling the underlying hardware.
Open source software has thrived and played a prominent role in building the Internetís infrastructure. Many companies rely on Linux-based computers and Apache web server software to display their web pages. The Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome web browsers have emerged as formidable competition to Microsoft Internet Explorer / Edge and Apple Safari.
In 2002, Red Hat, Inc. released its RHEL: Red Hat Enterprise Linux distribution. It has become the first billion dollar open source software company: middleware, enterprise storage, application development, and cloud computing. Red Hat provides open source software and services that help companies bridge different platforms. While Linux is available free of charge, RHEL: Red Hat Enterprise Linux contains software enhancements and the high level of technical support that corporations require. Red Hat has been focusing its resources on OpenShift which lets software developers build programs which can be run either in corporate data centers or on the cloud.
Many software developers consider source code not to be an executable device, but rather a description of device execution. This assumes that source code is not by itself covered by patent law and that the fundamental premise would apply even in countries where software patents are accepted. Independent nation states, negotiated integrated trade zones, and geopolitical spheres of influence apply different regulations and laws to software and intellectual property. Some countries accept software and algorithm patents; there can be ramifications with intellectual property infringement. Open source software packages now include switches or a patch that enable or disable patented code fragments according to the country where the code is used. The availability of source code directly applies to the detection of patent infringement by patent holders, and absence of an organization holding all the rights on the software makes it difficult to use standard mechanisms for defending patent litigation: cross-licensing or payment of royalties.
There have been issues with open source code and intellectual property licenses. The migration of software workloads to the cloud has changed the open source software industry. The Common Clause initiative adds restrictions that limit or prevent the selling of open source software. However, this license has not been widely accepted from the open source community. The SSPL: Server Side Public License is designed to protect open source software against expensive litigation and other issues relating to monetizing intellectual property code. SSPL is being reviewed and evaluated to become an Open Source Initiative-approved license. Apache Kafka software provider Confluent has a Confluent Community License that will enable users to download, modify, and redistribute code, but will not allow users to provide the software as a SaaS offering. The new community license is meant to replace the Apache 2.0 license for certain components of the Confluent data streaming platform, but will not affect the use of Apache Kafka, which was developed by the engineers at Confluent. SQL database provider Timescale is building open source features that will be made available under a TSL license. Some community features will be available at no charge; the exception will be hosted database-as-a-service version of TimescaleDB. Other features will require a commercial relationship with TimescaleDB unlocked and enterprise features available.
European governments use open source software as a counterbalancing tool to intellectual property law and promote competition, innovation, and the public interest in a free market economy. They support competition more than in the United States. European anti-trust regulators will evaluate and grant access to its markets based upon a balancing among leading commercial software and availability of open source software.
Several European countries have policies which promote government agencies and municipalities to consider open source software as alternatives to monopolistic commercial software such as choice in web browser, Linux in place of the Microsoft Windows operating system, and MySQL in place of a commercial database.
Open source projects are supported financially and used by leading information technology companies to shape markets in their own interest. Companies such as Alphabet-Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, and Oracle pay developers top salaries to work on open source projects which promote their own strategic objectives.
IBM has been a major backer of Linux, helping to raise it as a competitor to Microsoft Windows and other commercial operating systems. As part of transitioning its business model it has acquired companies based upon source platforms; in the fourth quarter 2018, it purchased Red Hat, Inc.
Google provided financial support to the non profit Mozilla Foundation, which oversees the development of Firefox. Google has developed and contributed to open source projects: web browser - Chrome, operating systems - Android and Chrome, programming languages - GO, containerization - Kubernetes, and dataflow programming - Tensorflow.
Hewlett-Packard, now HP enterprise and HP, Inc. open sourced its webOS operating system. HP acquired webOS from Palm and has been trying to recoup its investment after its failure in the smartphone and tablet market. The open source webOS provides hardware companies with a way to diversify and reduce their dependence on the Google Android operating system. HP could then revamp webOS while having a fallback position.
The Apache Hadoop project develops open source software for scalable, distributed computing. In conjunction with subprojects, it provides high availability software and services for clustered computers in large and diverse collections of data.1
Samsung provides financial support and is a platinum member of the Linux Foundation; this allows it to exert influence in how Linux is developed and the open source projects related to it.
The infrastructure of Twitter, Intank, and Servergy is supported by thousands of Linux servers. They joined the Linux Foundation and contribute to the Linux developer community for improving their own Linux operations and client software services.
SAIC, Accenture, Unisys, and CSC have provided open source services and expanding expertise beyond Linux to cover open source databases, middleware, and applications.
The Open Compute Project was founded by Facebook and Rackspace to improve data center energy efficiency; it is in its early stage of evaluation and acceptance as an international standard.
OpenStack is an open source cloud - IaaS: infrastructure as a service software comprised of interrelated projects which control pools of processing, storage, and networking resources within a data center. It is released under the terms of the Apache License.
Cloud Foundry is an open source cloud - PaaS: platform as a service for developing, deploying, running, and scaling applications. It is governed by the Cloud Foundry Foundation.
Microsoft Corporation acquired GitHub, an open source code repository. It also has been increasing its participation and support in open source projects. Open source software now is an important component of its business strategy.
OpenDaylight is an open source Linux Foundation project launched by leading information technology vendors for creating software that can serve as the foundation for future SDN: Software-defined Networking products and research.
Significant acquisitions in which an up-and-coming open source company has been inquired include the Java Platform and language by Oracle Corporation, MySQL by Sun Microsystems and subsequently Oracle Corporation, SpringSource by VMware, and XenSource by Citrix.
The Java programming language is available in the public domain free of charge; however, there is component code of the platform which requires a specific license from Oracle Corporation. The Java SDK code based on the Java API library also can be downloaded free of charge. A license is required when class libraries based on Java API designs are used and when Java software components are downloaded. The consensus among information technology executives and technologists is that although there are components of the Java language available at no cost and unrestricted in use, the Java platform requires a license which enforces restrictions in use.
The complexity of the Java language and platform is a legal question involving a mixed set of guidelines. In the Oracle Corporation versus Google Corporation legal action at the United States District Court in San Francisco, Google legal counsel asked Laurence Ellison, chief executive officer of Oracle Corporation under oath, whether the Java language is free open source software. Mr. Ellisonís response was that he did not know.
Linux is a stable open source operating system that features development tools, desktops, and applications. Most Linux software is developed as open source software and distributed along with the application. Programmers can make their own contributions to a software package's development, modifying and correcting the source code. Much of the software provided for Linux also are open source projects, as are the KDE and GNOME desktops along with most of their applications. The LibreOffice office suite is an open source project based on the StarOffice suite.
Open source software is protected by public licenses which prevent commercial companies from taking control by adding a few modifications, copyrighting those changes, and selling the software as their own product. The Linux operating system is distributed under the General Public License provided by the Free Software Foundation. The GNU General Public License retains the copyright; the software is licensed with the requirement that the software and any modifications made to it remain freely available. Other public licenses also have been created to support different kinds of open source projects. The GNU: LGPL: Lesser General Public License allows commercial applications to use GNU licensed software libraries. The QPL: Qt Public License permits open source developers to use the Qt libraries for the KDE desktop.
GNU: GNUís not UNIX software has proven reliable. Many of the popular Linux utilities, such as C compilers, shells, and editors, are GNU applications. Leading Linux distributions will include the GNUC++ and Lisp compilers, vi and Emacs editors, and BASH and TCSH shells. There are many open source software projects licensed under the GNU GPL. With the GNU Public License, there are no restrictions on selling the software or giving it away free.
Several major software companies contribute to the Linux Foundation and provide Linux-variants for their popular commercial software.
Open source software is being increasingly evaluated by organizational enterprise as an alternative to commercial software: affordability, performance, and usability. The strategic objective is to utilize open source software for improving the efficiency of IT infrastructure and innovating for competitive advantage. In order to ensure competition in the marketplace, the governments in different parts of the world are imposing regulations in accordance with their national agenda in order to ensure that there is an open source alternative to the major commercial software products.
Open source software has reached a level of maturity and acceptance, where it has become a standard practice as part of product evaluations to compare open source applications with commercial solutions.
|Open Source Stack||Open Source Software|
|Web Apps, Office Suite Applications, and Blogging|
|Operating System: UNIX- and Linux-variants|
|CETi is in the process of reviewing and categorizing open source mobile databases. Information can be reviewed at SYS-ED software specific websites.|
Proponents advocate the use of open source software for the following reasons:
|Avoid Vendor Lock-in||Open source software is built on standard technologies and offers interoperability with commercial software. This can serve to mitigate being held captive to license and maintenance contract price increases from commercial software vendors.|
|Commodity Hardware||The use of commodity hardware rather than commercial machines represents a significant cost saving. Both the initial outlay for base systems and hardware maintenance will be less expensive. Architecture independence allows software to be transferred across physical systems.|
|Innovation||There are parties in the open source community working to refine and expand the functionality of open source software. Upgrades, patches, and bug fixes typically are released faster than commercial software.|
|Security||In many cases, open source software will be more secure than commercial software and fewer remedial activities and resources will be needed to keep systems and data safe.|
|Value||Since development costs are shared by a community of parties, open source software will be less expensive than commercial software.|
|Tradeoffs and Disadvantages||Explanation|
|Software incompatibility||There can be inconsistencies and problems with integrating open source software with existing software.|
|Support and Maintenance||There can be uncertainty and risk associated with the support provided with an open source software ecosystem: technical difficulties, maintenance, and troubleshooting. In many situations, there can be no guaranteed response time for submitted questions and problems.|
|Costs - Open Source Software||There will be costs associated with free software. The open source software requires investment and development of salaried staff to provided specialized support and service.|
|Documentation - Shortcomings||The completeness, quality, and third party availability of documentation associated with open source software typically is inferior to commercial software.|
|Intellectual Property||There can be additional complexity associated with open source software. The absence of an organization holding all the rights on the software makes it difficult to use standard mechanisms for defending usage rights and patent litigation.|
CETi downloads and evaluates open source software. OSS is used and coded on www.sysed.com and SYS-ED software specific websites. The websites demonstrate and prototype how OSS software can present content and programmatically engage with client organizations. A reviewer service is planned for evaluating the documentation and certification course offerings available through open source purveyor websites. The CETi course search engine presents titles, subject matter, duration, and audience; the objective is to streamline, expand, and diversity the availability of open source training alternatives available in hybrid and cross operating system platform information technology. Research and a cognitive search engine will identify low cost and free training alternatives, provide strategic learning paths, and list digital resources.